Item Detail Information
Supplemental programmatic environmental assessment for Army 2020 force structure realignment
Book
Supplemental programmatic environmental assessment for Army 2020 force structure realignment
Copies
1 Total copies, 1 Copies are in, 0 Copies are out.
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires federal agencies to consider potential environmental impacts prior to undertaking a course of action. NEPA is implemented through regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Parts 1500-1508); and within the Army by 32 CFR Part 651, Environmental Analysis of Army Actions. In accordance with these requirements, the Army has prepared a Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Assessment (SPEA) to consider environmental effects on installations that could result from implementation of the Proposed Action to realign Army forces from Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 through FY 2020. The SPEA was prepared as a supplemental NEPA evaluation to the Army's 2013 Programmatic Environmental Assessment (2013 PEA) due to changes to the purpose and need described in the previous document.
  • Share It:
  • Pinterest
Title
Supplemental programmatic environmental assessment for Army 2020 force structure realignment
Authors
Smith, Spence H.
Army Environmental Command Fort Sam Houston, Texas
Subjects
Environmental impact analysis--Noise.
Environmental impact analysis--Geology.
Environmental impact analysis--Soil.
Environmental impact analysis--Water resources.
Environmental impact analysis--Wildlife.
Environmental impact analysis--Wetlands.
Environmental impact analysis--Cultural resources.
Environmental impact analysis--Utilities.
Environmental impact analysis--Toxic materials.
Environmental impact analysis--Hazardous materials.
Environmental impact analysis--Traffic and transportation.
Environmental impact analysis--Energy demand and generation.
Environmental impact analysis--Land use conflicts.
Environmental impact analysis--Socioeconomics.
Environmental impact analysis--Biological resources.
Environmental impact analysis--Air space.
Environmental impact analysis--Air quality.
Aberdeen Proving Ground (Md.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Belvoir (Va.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Benning (Ga.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Bliss (Tex.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Bragg (Calif.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Campbell (Ky. and Tenn.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Carson (Colo.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Drum (N.Y.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Gordon (Ga.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Hood (Tex.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Huachuca (Ariz.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Irwin (Calif.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Jackson (S.C.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Knox (Ky.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Leavenworth (Kan.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Leonard Wood (Mo.)--Environmental statements.
Fort George G. Meade (Md.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Polk (La.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Riley (Kan.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Rucker (Ala.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Sill (Ok.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Stewart (Ga.)--Environmental statements.
Fort Wainwright (Alaska)--Environmental statements.
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (Alaska)--Environmental statements.
Joint Base Lewis-McChord (Wash.)--Environmental statements.
Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston (Tex.)--Environmental statements.
U.S. Army Garrison (Hawaii).--Environmental statements.
Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies
Environmental Health and Safety
Army facilities
Environmental assessment
Environmental impact
Organizational realignment
Policies
Regulations
Requirements
Language
English
Published
[Morristown, New Jersey] : The Louis Berger Group, Inc., 2014.
Publication Desc
xliii, various pagination ;
Dimensions
28 cm.