The Regionally Aligned Forces (RAF) concept, introduced in 2012, requires Army leaders to train to higher levels of proficiency in traditional warfighting capabilities while also developing the knowledge and skillset needed to support security cooperation. This monograph argues that Army leaders must integrate engagement with other warfighting functions and improve interdependence between conventional forces (CF) and special operations forces (SOF) to conduct operations supporting the RAF concept effectively. Using the Army's first regionally aligned brigade, 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, as the subject, a single structured focused case study tests three hypotheses to provide insights to Army leaders charged with planning and executing future RAF operations. The three hypotheses are: RAF operations require Army forces to conduct military engagement, specifically in tasks associated with Security Force Assistance; RAF operations require the Army's organizational culture to place the same value on engagement as other warfighting functions; and the relationship between CF and SOF conducting RAF operations is interdependent. This study finds Army proficiency in traditional warfighting skills and engagement-centric skills are essential to the RAF concept. Evidence developed throughout the study supports the assertion that Army leaders must integrate engagement with other warfighting functions and improve interdependence between CF and SOF to maximize effectiveness.

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student-authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to these studies should include the foregoing statement.)