Forgot your password?

Typewriter leadership in a Facebook world.
e-Document
Typewriter leadership in a Facebook world.
Copies
0 Total copies, 0 Copies are in, 0 Copies are out.
Throughout history, technology has played a vital role in combat. While improvements in weaponry are typically at the front of the military leader's minds, technology like the internet would not appear to be as significant. However, the internet has drastically increased the speed at which news and information travels around the world. While this fact alone does not change how military leaders must think both tactically and strategically, it does require leaders to be adaptive and responsive to the strategic impact of tactical news and information. Historically, information was a form of power closely guarded, secured, and provided only when there was a need to know. Modern communication equipment and the internet make global news available to anyone who wants it, or wants to provide it. Senior military leaders grew up in the Military during a period where this technology was not a reality. In that short period of time, typewritten forms were replaced by emails and instant messaging. Failing to adapt to the speed at which information travels has plagued today's military leadership in dealing with the management and understanding of information, traditional media, and new forms of media like the internet. Legacy policies towards information management have crippled the United States efforts against terrorism creating a military that is reactive and defensive towards what Thomas L. Friedman refers to as 'A Flat World.' This monograph focuses on both these failures, and indicates a way ahead in understanding Strategic Communications (STRATCOMs) within the military and creating a culture that is both proactive and adaptive to the realities of STRATCOMs in the 21st Century. Military leadership failed to understand the strategic impact of key events in Afghanistan and Iraq. Compounding this lack of understanding was the ability to visualize the second and third order effects of military plans and operations in the strategic landscape. The failure to visualize these effects resulted in strategic messages reactive, defensive and unresponsive to the fast-paced, global-media world they faced. This monograph shows these failures as far back as the NATO Bombing of the Chinese Embassy in 1999, but uses recent cases in Afghanistan and Iraq including that of Corporal Patrick Tillman and Abu Ghraib. These failures had damaging effects on both immediate operational objectives and long term strategic goals. The military culture is slowly changing, but will fail to adapt to the 'Flat World' if all military leaders educated by typewriter leadership fails to adapt to the Facebook World.
  • Share It:
  • Pinterest
IDTitleUnavailableFromToCopies
zoom in
zoom out
Title
Your Rating
MLA
APA
Chicago
Picture Scale
0 / 0