One of the key requirements for U.S. maneuver forces to be able to win the first battle is the quick and accurate location of engaged enemy units in the battle area. At present and into the foreseeable future, ground surveillance radar will continue to provide the maneuver commander with a substantial part of this immediate intelligence information of-the-art technology provides the Army with two distinct types of radar to accomplish the ground surveillance radar mission. The first is a high frequency, line-of-sight system; the second is a low frequency, foliage independent system. Because monetary and manpower constraints will limit the types and numbers of radar systems eventually deployed, the Army must choose that system which best fulfills its ground surveillance radar needs. This paper investigates the efficacy of both systems to detect, locate, and identify targets of military interest under stated evaluative conditions. It addresses both the machine and the man-machine/human factors aspects of radar operation. The demonstrated capabilities of both systems are compared and evaluated to determine which system shows the greatest potential to optimize the Army's ground surveillance radar capability. The study concludes that low frequency radar systems offer the best practical solution to finding the enemy. It further recommends that the Army place priority effort into developing low frequency radar systems for future ground use.

ADA 043739 Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student-authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to these studies should include the foregoing statement.)